A common question among museum-goers is “why can’t people take flash photographs in museums?” The answer is usually something along the lines of how it can cause significant damage to works of art, especially when it happens often.
There are two sides to the coin. On one side, it would be ignorant to completely disregard the fact that light does nothing to paintings. On the other side, although that statement has been repeated multiple times, in many ways, it doesn’t make it entirely true.
To be technical, flash produces both light and heat which can trigger a variety of chemical reactions. For example, exposure to light and heat causes the cellulose in paper to break down and damage many pigments. If you’ve ever left a photograph in a sunny window for a few weeks or months you probably noticed a difference in its appearance.
Exposure to light can degrade many works of art, but the idea that light from photoflash is more harmful was debunked in a year-long study at the National Gallery, which was published in their Technical Bulletin in 1995. Sensitive works of art were displayed in galleries where light levels are reduced. In those galleries, it was shown that one minute of gallery lighting is equal to 50 typical photographic flashes.
Informed curators no longer believe flash is a threat to works of art. Although it’s agreed that flash is irritating to other gallery visitors. There are always going to be curators that seek to control photography, regardless of flash or not, by claiming copyright rules; yet, they vary greatly from one country to another and are very difficult to interpret in law.
Some museums ban all photography because of copyright concerns, or by request of an artist or the owner of a loaner collection. Snapping photos under those conditions could result in being asked to leave the premises.
Many institutions are now revising their policies. Museums such as the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Art Institute of Chicago, the National Gallery of Art, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, and the Getty Museum all allow photography in some or all of their permanent collection spaces.
Many directors of museums agree that they’re fighting an uphill battle if they restrict photography. The director of the Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History, Nina Simon, said “even in the most locked-down spaces, people will take pictures and you’ll still find a million of these images online. So why not support it in an open way that’s constructive and embrace the public?"
Enforcing no-photography policies can turn out to be counter-intuitive. Today’s technology forces guards to end up spending too much time focusing on someone holding a smart phone or device, leaving a window open for someone to get away with touching art. Museums want to make the most of having guards present, so revising the policy seems most practical.
Regardless of where you might stand on the issue, at Mini Masters we don’t mind seeing our pieces of art photographed. Our high-quality canvas paintings have every reason to hang along the walls of a museum; although art lovers might need to step a little closer to see a print in its full glory.
Browse our extensive gallery of artwork to turn your home or office into a personal art gallery. There are a wide range of popular American artists to choose from, with the grand masters of fine art such as Van Gogh and Cézanne joining the gallery soon.